Tuesday, 2 November 2010

Long Time no Here

Westminster Council  are putting up all sorts of resistance as to why I can't have the information requested in a Freedom of Information Request about  lying  social workers, Farrah Nasir and Paul Anderson and why they funded my mother's legal bills, to the tune of £60 000. I asked to see their qualifications and confirmation that both were legally working in the UK. I am told this information falls under an exclusion. Well it doesn't actually because these imbeciles made  decisions and told lies in Section 7 Reports that could have resulted in my losing my chidlren. Forever. And I want to see what  qualifications they have to be able to make those decisions. And we know how "lapsed" the last administration was about checking on the employability status of  its flunkies. Remember Baroness Scotland?

So now, an internal review about my request for information, which they'll have to cough up eventually.

The other  Freedom of Information request  which asked for the following:

All costs pertaining to public money being used to fund a non-resident, non UK citizen' grandmother's legal expenses in vexatious litigation in the Family Court, London, case
Farah Dan v Zarin Damji

All money paid or owing to Fisher Meredith (grandmother's solicitors)  in this action

Written basis of decsion to fund this application though Westminster is not and has never been a party in these proceedings

Billed, unpaid and anticipated invoices due to Fisher Meredith on behalf of the grandmother
On what legal decision and precedent Westminster City Council decided to fund this defence which has no merit as the grandmother is currently being investigated for murdering her husband, is 71 years old and has a serious heart condition, none of which have been diclosed to Westminster, nor in turn to the Family Court through Creightons Westminster's solicitors or Fisher Meredith

Westminster City Council's response is

I can inform you that the financial information you have requested is not held by Wesminster City Council, but by Creighton and Partners.  Creightons are contracted to provide legal representation for the Council and, under this arrangement, they hold and manage all case-specific information.  For the purposes of section 1 (4) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 this information is not held and we are therefore unable to provide it.

Any information held by Westminster City Council relating to decisions taken with regard to a case would make reference to specific individuals.  It is considered that disclosure of this information would breach Principle 1 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (Fair and Lawful Processing).  This is because it would be unfair to those people identified in the information who have no expectation that their personal data would be made public.

For this reason it is considered that the information is exempt from disclosure under Section 40 (2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, Personal Information. This is an absolute exemption and not subject to a public interest test.

This letter therefore acts as a refusal notice in accordance with Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in respect of the above. You have the right of appeal against the decision.  If you wish to appeal please set out in writing your grounds of appeal and send to the address at the top of this letter.

Should you be dissatisfied with the outcome of any such complaint you have the right to make a complaint  you have the right to make a complaint to the Information Commissioner, pursuant to section 50 of the FOIA.  

Complaint gone to the Information Commissioner today and also to Frank Dobson, my new MP who is also investigating why Westminster ( read public funds) paid all my mother's legal fees when she claims in her last statement to the court that she was loaded, had millions of pounds and South African Rands in accounts all over the world and  was solvent. 

Essentially, if I hdn't blogged about it and kicked up an unholy fuss, in order to get it in front of a Family Court judge, again,  I  would have lost my children. I didn't. I got a miracle result and  I dared  to say  "no, actually you will not behave in that way, you will do your job and what you tasked to do by the court, you will not tell lies and get away with it."  But if I had left it to the gormless lying, worthless social workers , hideous blood-sucking barristers, solicitors such as Claire Thorpe, and the idiotic crank from Children and Families Across Borders, a fake charity formerly known as ISS ( International Social Services) I would have been one of the figures, a mere pawn in the  system, another woman who had been further criminalized and excluded.  And lost her children to the state. Or worse, her own mother.

CFAB "charity" wrote to me recently threatening me with legal action if I didn't stop saying that the caseworker allocated to my family was a paedophile. There, I said it again. Marek Ganther who works for Children and Families across Borders made highly inappropriate and damaging remarks to my son, who was only 12 at the time, encouraging him to run away from home and  he made suggestions of a sexual nature. Now sue me and let the truth come out about what a shamless, baseless disgusting "charity" this is.

This ain't over. Not by a long shot.

No comments:

Post a Comment

"You're a Veteran? That means nothing!" Mirrion Sozansky, Manchester City Council, Housing Dept

“Being a Veteran means nothing"  “More than 2,500 former members of the armed forces entered the prison system last year, with...